The Mathematical Connections in the De Stijl movement Essays -- Essays

The Mathematical Connections in the De Stijl movement De Stijl or â€Å"The Style† is a movement that originated in Holland with the first publication of the periodical De Stijl in 1917. The works produced took art to a whole new level, pushing creativity to the new modern era. The emergence of the De Stijl movement coincided with constructivism in Russia, with influences from Cubism and the artist Kadinsky. However, the movement was not confined to just one art form. Similar to the Blue Rider and Bauhaus movements, De Stijl spanned to other forms of art like sculpture, furniture design, architecture, and graphic design. The movement continued up until the last published issue of De Stijl in 1931. Major contributors to the group include Piet Mondrian, Theo van Doesburg, and Georges Vantongerloo. These artists helped to define the De Stijl through their use of form and geometry inspired by mathematics. The De Stijl movement is recognizable in the simplistic use of forms on a plane. Pieces produced during the period of the periodical’s production are distinguished from other abstract work of the time in this use of geometry. Unlike Cubism, De Stijl is more structured and less interested in conveying a particular object through analysis of the different perspectives. The De Stijl went beyond such an interpretation and headed towards a more utopian goal of perfect balance. Paul Overy explains, â€Å"The single element, perceived as separate, and the configuration of elements, perceived as a whole, were intended to symbolize the relationship between the individual and the collective (or the universal)† (8). This idea can be described as almost mysticism in that they were concerned with the overall symboli... ...ple, their exploration with simple forms, planes, axis, and grids resulted in a balance. This balance, in turn, was part of the utopian idea of the De Stijl. The utopia represented the new age arising with technology and the future. It is no surprise that the De Stijl movement is one of the major forerunners of modern art, setting its own â€Å"formula† for inspiration. Works Cited Jaffe, H.C.L. The De Stijl Group: Dutch Plastic Art. Trans. Roy Edwards. J.M. Meulenhoff, Amsterdam. Joosten, Joop. â€Å"Paint and Sculpture in the Context of De Stijl.† De Stijl: 1917-1931 Visions of Utopia, pp. 50-67. Phaidon, Oxford: 1982. Overy, Paul. De Stijl. Thames and Hudson, London: 1991. Troy, Nancy J. The De Stijl Environment. The MIT Press, London: 1983. Warncke, Carsten-Peter. The Ideal as Art De Stijl 1917-1931. Benedikt Taschen, Germany: 1991.

Revelation and Rebirth in Helena Viramontes The Moths Essay

Revelation and Rebirth in Helena Viramonte's The Moths  Ã‚      The famous phrase "looks may be deceiving" strongly pertains to Helena Viramontes's short story, "The Moths." The story, instead of focusing the creatures in the title, is actually about a young girl who comes of age as she is faced with the deterioration and death of her grandmother. Even though the title, "The Moths," seems to have no relevance at the beginning, these creatures help to portray a sense of spirituality, rebirth, and become, finally, an incarnation of the grandmother. The relationship between the moths and the main characters aids in conveying the main theme of the story, which is not simply the death of a loved one, but a spiritual and maturing experience undergone by the grandchild. The moths help illustrate a sense of spirituality in this short story. Abuelita, the grandmother, uses old remedies which stem from a religious/spiritual nature to cure physical illnesses such as scarlet fever and other infirmities. Her granddaughter is very disrespectful and doubtful of the medicines which her grandmother used, but they always work. The granddaughter tells us that "Abuelita made a balm out of dried moth wings . . . [to] shape my hands back to size" (Viramontes 1239). In this way the granddaughter begins to accept the spiritual belief and hope. The spirituality is not only present in the moth wing balm, but is also evident after the death of her grandmother. A sense of spirituality is apparent in the quote, "Then the moths came. Small gray ones that came from her soul and out through her mouth fluttering to light" (1242). This presents a religious parallel in which the light resembles heaven. These moths represent angels who are carrying Abuelit... ...esses the grandchild?s comfort when she is at her grandmother?s house (1239). Abuelita is her grandchild?s guardian angel or moth?she shows her the light. She cures her illnesses, instills values in her, and brings religion into her life. She is the reason that the grandchild undergoes such spiritual and emotional maturation. It is clearly apparent that "The Moths" is not only the title, but also an important piece of the story which embodies its central theme. The moths become the catalyst that gives identity to the grandmother and her granddaughter, bringing revelation, security, rebirth, and the desire to be reunited. The grandmother, in becoming a moth herself, leaves some of herself behind with her grandchild. Works Cited Viramontes, Helena. "The Moths." The Harper Anthology of Fiction. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. New York: HarperCollins, 1991. 1239- 1242.   

McClellan

The first campaign of the Civil War was the first win for the Union and was under the command of George B. McClellan.   It was a minor battle but with this battle, under McClellan’s leadership successfully drove confederate troops out of the Kanawha Valley of western Virginia in May and June of 1861.   This was described in James McPherson’s book â€Å"Ordeal by Fire† (159).   McClellan’s victory gave the region a firm grip for the Union side and kept it from becoming in control of the confederates and eventually became West Virginia.   But the first major battle was a totally different story.This was the battle of Bull Run Creek and it was a disaster.   McClellan though helped this battle and became the savior, if even for the moment.   Because McClellan replaced McDowell who was the general at the time and this became the boost he needed to later become general in chief (Rowland, 1998 p. 86).   McClellan spent the fall and winter drilling h is troops and whipping them into shape.   He was known for his slow way of doing things and this made Lincoln very agitated.This was probably why the rumors began to fly about McClellan’s inability to be a general began and it was no secret that McClellan had such contempt for Lincoln.   On more than one occasion President Lincoln it was said that he couldn’t understand why McClellan was taking so long and insisted he go into the battle field.   Lincoln insisting he was being too slow ordered the army into action, McClellan’s slowness was mentioned several times in both required readings and was said to be cautious or meticulous.Both books I read, â€Å"Ordeal by Fire† and â€Å"George B. McClellan and Civil War History† were written on the Civil War.   But Thomas Rowland’s book core subject was on George B. McClellan.   James McPherson’s book was more of a broader book covering the war with the central theme on the Civil Wa r and only discussed McClellan’s generalship in a small section of the book.The other book dealt more exclusively on the man and his abilities.   In Rowland’s book he looked at the mental abilities of McClellan’s and coined him deranged and paranoiac.   This too was mentioned in McPherson’s book but only that he had possible mental problems and possibly other problems that affected his abilities of being a general.Some of the problems with McClellan that both books do address are his slowness and problems of exaggeration.   This exaggeration usually involved how many were in the opposing troops or in his troop’s inabilities to win a battle because of training time or supplies.   It is commonly accepted though that McClellan was considered a failure as a general, but Rowland still defends his generalship to the bitter end.There were several bad decisions made by McClellan during his service in the Civil War.   Union forces in the West had won some very important victories before McClellan could make a move to aid the fighting troops and this was a dark cloud over his leadership.   The successes around the edge of the confederacy did not help to relieve the frustration many were feeling at the inactivity or failure of the Union forces on the eastern front and this helped to reinforce the general attitude towards McClellan’s generalship.Lincoln, because of this frustration, relieved McClellan of his command and ordered him to take the offensive command at the head of the Army of the Potomac and forced McClellan to begin campaigning (McPherson, 1982 p. 211).   The overland route to Richmond was difficult so instead he moved his forces by water to the peninsula southeast of the confederate capital.   After landing at Fort Monroe, a Union post, McClellan began moving up the peninsula and in early April of 1862.   For months he remained at Yorktown choosing to besiege the enemy instead of attacking.This was another sign of his slowness and stagnation (Rowland, 1998 p. 107).   Then after the fall of Yorktown he pushed ahead to a point twenty miles from Richmond and waited for troops he had expected Lincoln would send, but that didn’t happen because Lincoln believed that the troops should instead be sent to defend Washington instead.   This infuriated McClellan.Many believe that if McClellan had moved more swiftly and decisively he probably would have captured Richmond with the forces he had available.   But with a combination of faulty intelligence reports and his own natural caution he failed.   He believed that he was outnumbered by the opposing troops and this was wrong (McPherson, 1982 p. 234).   It was by the end of May that the Confederates learned that McClellan’s army was divided on each side of the Chickahominy River and decided to attack.This battle named Seven Pines was where McClellan was barely able to hold his ground.   Finally Corps from the othe r side of the river crossed and saved his butt.   It was during this battle that General Lee took command of the confederate army.   General Lee at the end of June decided to put an all out effort to expel McClellan from his position on the outskirts of Richmond.   In a series of battles that lasted seven days McClellan warded off Lee’s final assaults at Malvera hill and decided to retreat down the peninsula to a more secure point.   In doing this it convinced Lincoln that the peninsula campaign was a wasted battle (Rowland, 1998 p. 66-67).It was on July 11th, 1862 that Lincoln appointed General Henry W. Halleck who had been in command in the western theater, to be the new general in chief.   Halleck was ordered by Lincoln to command McClellan to withdrawal his army from the peninsula and join forces under General Pope that was preparing to move on Richmond by the overland route.   Again McClellan was slow in responding and the confederates got to Pope before he d id.   Pope was badly beaten before McClellan could arrive.   This pissed Lincoln off and McClellan was ordered back to Washington where he was stripped of his command, but later out of desperation he was reappointed to the head of the army of the Potomac (McPherson, 1982 p. 255-260).Meanwhile Lee and his troops went on to invade Maryland in hopes of isolating Washington from the rest of the North.   Soon McClellan caught up with him near Sharpsburg and this became the bloodiest one day battle of the Civil War.   At Antietam on September 17th almost five thousand solders were killed on both sides and another eighteen thousand were wounded.The battle ended in a draw forcing Lee to withdraw south of the Potomac River to protect his low supplies.   McClellan again was slow in his pursuit of the general and Lincoln blamed him for letting the enemy escape (Rowland, 1998 p.176).   This lead to Lincoln believing he needed a stronger general because McClellan was so slow that he appointed Ambrose B. Burnside as commander of the Army of the Potomac.   A mistake on Lincolns part because Rowland believed he was â€Å"replacing someone slow with someone that was considered dense† (Rowland, 1998 p. 223).In Rowland’s book he argues the war was divided with each having demands on the commanders that fought the battles.   In Rowland’s book it depicts McClellan as overly cautious, proud, psychologically impaired, yet having an aristocratic air about him.   This aristocratic officer was very apt at fighting very formidable commanders such as Lee and Jackson.   With the battle of Seven Pines and Antietam campaign he had to face what Rowland says were very tough troops that gave McClellan every reason for caution.   Other reasons for McClellan’s failures were the troops he was given.   Thrown together hastily and unprepared.   He said the nation was expecting quick wins and fast victories that just didn’t happen.   Thi s too is why McClellan’s slowness was brought up so many times in each book.Sources used to write the books included historical documents, letters and diaries, but one thing that Rowland differs from McPherson is that he gives more weight to writings by other professionals that are considered quite controversial on the subject.   Rowland used those sources for the basis of his thesis, which I believe gives a little less credibility to his work.   McPherson on the other hand used a large amount of historically accurate documents, letters and diaries.   His use of reference and his bibliography was quite impressive.   In Rowland’s book he wrote more of feelings than on giving facts.I know Civil War history relies heavily on personal letters and notes, but I think taking these documents for face value is what McPherson did instead of adding his own personal beliefs.   Letters between McClellan and his wife were used a lot in Rowland’s book and this is fin e but letters like these, to a wife during war, really aren’t the best use for facts.   I think that at times of war many of the letters to family and friends leave much details out so they would not be worried about their family members so much of the writings need to be taken with a grain of salt.If asked which book I would put more stock into it would be McPherson’s book.   It dealt more with black and white facts and was more of a historically timetabled book.   After seeing all the research he had put into his book he won hands down.   He did an excellent job of sifting through the tons of papers and historical documents to write a very clear and interesting book on the Civil War.Both authors agree that McClellan wasn’t the best general nor do they believe he was the worst.   McPherson mentioned others that were just as bad or worst.   McPherson did mention something that Rowland failed to mention and that was McClellan’s problem with chr onic exaggeration (McPherson, 1982 p. 212).   This was quite a problem that he had affecting his abilities and image as a general.   I agree with Roland that he wanted to give a more balanced look at the man General George B. McClellan and I think he did an excellent job in giving him overdue recognition for some of his achievements.He gave excellent reasons as to why he thought McClellan did what he did and thought he did a good job.   â€Å"McClellan’s strategy, though reflective of the unrealistic war aims of the years 1861-1862 was cogent, reasoned, and consistent with conventional military wisdom and his personal views of the nature of the conflict.   It was not hallucinatory or deranged; it mirrored the views of the administration and of a sizeable, if not shrinking, majority† (Rowland, 1998 p. 237).   Rowland goes on to say that because McClellan didn’t have great or a large amount of wins is the only reason he was given a bad reputation and was n’t credited with any of his accomplishments.Reference:McPherson, J.M. (1982).   Ordeal by fire: The Civil War and reconstruction. New York: Knopf.Rowland, T.J. (1998).   George B. McClellan and Civil War history: In the shadow of Grant and Sherman.   Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.

Health System in Egypt

Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO Contents F O R E W O R D †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 5 1 E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 7 2 S O C I O E C O N O M I C G E O P O L I T I C A L M A P P I N G †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 11 2. 1 Socio-cultural Factors †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢ € ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 1 2. 2 Economy †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 11 2. 3 Geography and Climate †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 12 2. 4 Political/ Administrative Structure †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 12 3 H E A L T H S T A T U S A N D D E M O G R A P H I C S †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 14 3. 1 Health Status Indicators †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 4 3. 2 Demography †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 15 4 H E A L T H S Y S T E M O R G A N I Z A T I O N †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 17 4. 1 Brief History of the Health Care System †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 17 4. 2 Public Health Care System †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 17 4. 3 Private Health Care System†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 20 4. 4Overall Health Care System †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 21 5 G O V E R N A N C E /O V E R S I G H T †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 23 5. 1 Process of Policy, Planning and management †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 23 5. 2 Decentralization: Key characteristics of principal types †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 24 5. 3 Health Information Systems†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢ € ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 27 5. 4 Health Systems Research†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 8 5. 5 Accountability Mechanisms †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 28 6 H E A L T H C A R E F I N A N C E A N D E X P E N D I T U R E †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 29 6. 1 Health Expenditure Data and Trends †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 29 6. 2 Tax-based Financing †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚ ¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 32 6. 3 Insurance †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 33 6. 4Out-of-Pocket Payments †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 40 6. 5 External Sources of Finance †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 41 6. 6 Provider Payment Mechanisms †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 41 7 H U M A N R E S O U R C E S †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â ‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 45 7. 1 Human resources availability and creation †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 45 7. 2 Human resources policy and reforms over last 10 years†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 55 8HEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 59 8. 1 Service Delivery Data for Health services †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 59 8. 2 Package of Services for Health Care †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 63 8. 3 Primary Health Care †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 63 8. 4 Non personal Services: Preventive/Promotive Care †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 75 8. 5 Secondary/Tertiary Care †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 7 8. 6 Long-Term Care †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 90 8. 7 Pharmaceuticals †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚ ¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 89 8. 8 Technology †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 100 9 HEALTH SYSTEM REFORMS†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 101 9. 1 Summary of Recent and planned reforms †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 101 10REFERENCES †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 107 11. ANNEXES †¦Ã¢â ‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 11. 1 Ministry of Health and Population Organogram†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 1 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO List of Tables Table 2. 1 Socio-cultural indicators Table 2. 2 Economic Indicators Table 2. 3 Major Imports and Exports Table 3. 1 Indicators of Health status Table 3. 2 Indicators of Health status by Gender and by urban rural 2006Table 3. 3 Top 10 causes of Mortality Table 3. 4 Demographic indicators Table 3. 5 Demographic indicators by Gender and Urban rural Table 6. 1 Health Expenditure Table 6. 2 Sources of finance, by percent Table 6. 3 Health Expenditures by Category Table 6. 3. 1. Health care financing i n Egypt: coverage, eligibility and benefits Table 6. 4 Population coverage by source Table 6. 4. 1 Distribution of HIO beneficiaries by law (1995–2002) Table 6. 4. 2 Comparison between 2002 and 1995 estimates Table 6. 4. 3 Comparative expenditures and subsidies from MOF to hospital services, financial year 2004/2005Table 6. 4. 4 Performance Indicators Table 7. 1 Health care personnel Table 7. 1. 1 Staff registered with syndicates Table 7. 1. 2 Comparison of staff registered and in post in MOHP, December 2005 Table 7. 1. 3 Staff registered and in post in MOHP plus percentage increase in difference over 20 years Table 7. 1. 4 Physicians and nurses by health sector (%) Table 7. 1. 5 Geographical distribution of MOHP physicians and nurses Table 7. 1. 6 Distribution of physicians and nurses by governorate per 100,000 population (2005) Table 7. 2 Human Resource Training Institutions for Health Table 8. 1Service Delivery Data and Trends Table 8. 1. 1 Improvement in hospital based se rvices (1996–2005) Table 8. 1. 2 Distribution of health facilities across Egypt (2006) Table 8. 1. 3 Distribution of health care workers in Egypt (2006) Table 8. 1. 4 Comparison of specialists (2005) Table 8. 1. 5 Comparison of specialists (2005) Table 8. 1. 6 Comparison of MOHP and HIO registered and in post personnel2005 Table 8. 1. 7 Distribution of physicians with private clinics by number of jobs (%) 2 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO Table 8. 1. 8 Governorates distribution according to phasesTable 8. 1. 9 Basic preventive and promotional public health services Table 8. 2 Inpatient use and performance Table 8. 2. 1 National distribution of inpatient beds by type of facility (2005) Table 8. 2. 2 Change in hospital beds by type of provider (1991, 1997, 2001) Table 8. 2. 3 MOHP strategy (1997, 2001, 2017) Table 8. 2. 4 Distribution of physicians among some service providers (2002) Table 8. 2. 5 Bed distribution by health provider in go vernorates Table 8. 2. 6 Beds/population by governorate and type of provider (2005) Table 8. 2. 7 Private sector providers (2005) Table 8. 2. 8Private sector services (2002) Table 8. 7 expenditure by type of provider and ownership (2005) 3 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO List of Figures Figure 1 Uses of health resources, by categories of providers Figure 2 Sources of revenues for the health sector, 1995 Figure 3 Distribution of HIO beneficiaries by law (1995–2002) Figure 4 Distribution of physicians and nurses by governorate per 100,000 population (2001) Figure 5 Beds per populations in governorates Figure 6 Growth trends in the pharmaceutical market Figure 7 Expected value of the market size in 2010Figure 8 Trend in drug consumption as expenditure per capita Figure 9 Drug expenditure in private and governmental sector Figure 10 Distribution of drug consumption by therapeutic category (2001–2002) 4 Health Systems Profile- Egypt R egional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO F OREWORD Health systems are undergoing rapid change and the requirements for conforming to the new challenges of changing demographics, disease patterns, emerging and re emerging diseases coupled with rising costs of health care delivery have forced a comprehensive review of health systems and their functioning.As the countries examine their health systems in greater depth to adjust to new demands, the number and complexities of problems identified increases. Some health systems fail to provide the essential services and some are creaking under the strain of inefficient provision of services. A number of issues including governance in health, financing of health care, human resource imbalances, access and quality of health services, along with the impacts of reforms in other areas of the economies significantly affect the ability of health systems to deliver.Decision-makers at all levels need to appraise the variation in health system perfor mance, identify factors that influence it and articulate policies that will achieve better results in a variety of settings. Meaningful, comparable information on health system performance, and on key factors that explain performance variation, can strengthen the scientific foundations of health policy at national, regional and international levels.Comparison of performance across countries and over time can provide important insights into policies that improve performance and those that do not. The WHO regional office for Eastern Mediterranean has taken an initiative to develop a Regional Health Systems Observatory, whose main purpose is to contribute to the improvement of health system performance and outcomes in the countries of the EM region, in terms of better health, fair financing and responsiveness of health systems.This will be achieved through the following closely inter-related functions: (i) Descriptive function that provides for an easily accessible database, that is co nstantly updated; (ii) Analytical function that draws lessons from success and failures and that can assist policy makers in the formulation of strategies; (iii) Prescriptive function that brings forward recommendations to policy makers; (iv) Monitoring function that focuses on aspects that can be improved; and (v) Capacity building function that aims to develop partnerships and share knowledge across the region.One of the principal instruments for achieving the above objective is the development of health system profile of each of the member states. The EMRO Health Systems Profiles are country-based reports that provide a description and analysis of the health system and of reform initiatives in the respective countries. The profiles seek to provide comparative information to support policy-makers and analysts in the development of health systems in EMRO.The profiles can be used to learn about various approaches to the organization, financing and delivery of health services; descri be the process, content, and implementation of health care reform programs; highlight challenges and areas that require more in-depth analysis; and provide a tool for the dissemination of information on health systems and the exchange of experiences of reform strategies between policymakers and analysts in different countries.These profiles have been produced by country public health experts in collaboration with the Division of Health Systems & Services Development, WHO, EMRO based on standardized templates, comprehensive guidelines and a glossary of terms developed to help compile the profiles. A real challenge in the development of these health system profiles has been the wide variation in the availability of data on all aspects of health systems. The profiles are based on the most authentic sources of information available, which have been cited for ease of reference. For maintaining consistency and comparability in the sources of 5Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO information, efforts have been made to use as a first source, the information published and available from a national source such as Ministries of Health, Finance, Labor, Welfare; National Statistics Organizations or reports of national surveys. In case information is not available from these sources then unpublished information from official sources or information published in unofficial sources are used. As a last resort, country-specific information published by international agencies and research papers published in international and local journals are used.Since health systems are dynamic and ever changing, any additional information is welcome, which after proper verification, can be put up on the website of the Regional Observatory as this is an ongoing initiative and these profiles will be updated on regular intervals. The profiles along with summaries, template, guidelines and glossary of terms are available on the EMRO HSO website at www. who. int . healthobservatory It is hoped the member states, international agencies, academia and other stakeholders would use the information available in these profiles and actively participate to make this initiative a success.I would like to acknowledge the efforts undertaken by the Division of Health Systems and Services Development to help countries of the region in better analyzing health system performance and in improving it. Regional Director Eastern Mediterranean Region World Health Organization 6 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO 1 E XECUTIVE S UMMARY Egypt is going through a demographic and epidemiological transition that is affecting both the size and health status of the population. The population growth rate has fluctuated from a low of 1. 92% a year during 1966–1967, to 2. 5% annually during 1976–1986, later declining to 2% a year during 1980–1993 and 2. 1% annually in 2001. Changes in fertility and mortality rates ha ve been the major source of population growth in Egypt. The population pyramid has a wide base with children aged under 15 representing 37% of the population, reflecting relatively high fertility in recent years. The proportion of children aged under 10 years is smaller than the proportion aged 10–14 years. The rate decreased from 80 in 1988 to 69 in 2000, so the proportion of productive group aged 15–64 years has increased.The average age of the population has risen, with a life expectancy from birth of 65. 5 years for males in 1996 to 69. 2 years in 2006. It is higher for women than for men (69. 2 and 73. 6 years, respectively). Egypt is a lower-middle-income country with a per capita gross national product (GNP) that doubled between the years 1993 and 1999, from US $600 to $1200 (DHS, 2000). The Egyptian economy has witnessed a turnaround in growth performance following a period of economic slow-down that started in 1986.The adoption of the open door policy in 1975 afforded the Egyptian economy a decade of rapid economic growth, supported by large inflows of foreign assistance, workers’ remittances, and oil and tourism revenues. The drop in oil prices in 1986 signaled the end of a decade of economic boost, underscoring the volatility of Egypt’s key revenues sources and the constraints of an inward-oriented growth strategy. With the success of the stabilization program in achieving its objectives, Egypt has been successful in reversing the slow growth rates that characterized the period 1991–1995.Real GDP grew annually at an average of 3. 8% during 1993–1996 and at an average of 6% during 1996–1998. Inflation has been brought down from a peak of 21% in 1992 to 7% in 1996 and 3. 6% by 2000 (UNDP, 2000). While public expenditure on health in terms of budget share appears to be low in Egypt, overall spending at 3. 7% of GDP is also low, when compared to other comparable income countries. The Ministry of Health an d Population (MOHP) budget, as part of the entire Government budget, increased from 2. 2% in 1995/1996 to 3. % in 2000/2001 and the MOHP expenditure per capita increased from LE26. 8 in 1996 to LE56. 7 in 2001. The health financing system in Egypt today manifests significant systemic inefficiencies and inequities that severely limit the effectiveness of the health system as a whole. Any attempts to expand the scope of services or increase the revenues and expenditures on health care without first addressing these systemic bottlenecks in the health financing system will result in further exacerbating the inefficiencies and inequities in the system.The existing system of health financing mechanisms in place today, whether it is through the general revenues Ministry of Finance or the Health Insurance Organization system or through private spending, establishes a regressive pattern of resource mobilization and resource allocation. Inequities are evident across many dimensions, in terms of income levels, gender, geographical distribution (rural and urban, and by governorate levels), and health outcomes. 7 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMROThe coverage of the Egyptian population with the National Health Insurance scheme is increasing through the addition of new population groups under the umbrella of social health insurance, for example school children and newborn children. In the year 1980, the coverage was 4% of the total population, and it doubled in 1990. In the year 1995, it reached 36% and increased over the last ten years to 45%. Out of pocket spending has been rising over past decade and currently stands at 62%. HIO does not reach 80% of the private sector workforce.Highest governmental healthcare spend is proportionately in lowest income quintile. The 1952 Constitution pronounced free medical care as a basic right for all Egyptians. The Government has been the sole provider and financier of all primary/preventive and mos t inpatient curative care in Egypt. However, over the past two decades governmental budgetary constraints have resulted in relatively stagnant health expenditures. The structural adjustment program has also reduced the government's resource position vis-a-vis allocation for social services sectors in general, and health services in particular.The Egyptian health system has a pluralistic nature with a wide range of health care providers competing and complementing each other, allowing clients freedom of choice when seeking care according to their needs and ability to pay. However, the Government is committed to providing health care to poor and unprivileged population groups. Parallel to, and related to, its demographic transition, Egypt is currently facing an epidemiological transition that is characterized by:  ¦ Reduced mortality rates among infants and children from diarrhea, immunization-preventable diseases and respiratory infections. Rising prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, smoking and hypertension, responsible for chronic diseases.  ¦ A changing socioeconomic environment leading to different diets, increased industrialization, and increased motor vehicle traffic accidents. The distribution of the burden of diseases has changed from a predominance of infectious and parasitic diseases to a different mortality pattern whereby cardiovascular diseases are currently the leading cause of mortality (45% in 1991, compared to 12% in 1970 and 6. 3% in 2001).Egypt is therefore affected by a dual burden of disease, thus associating the morbidity and mortality patterns of developing countries with those induced by modernization. As a result of the demographic and epidemiological transition, the major health and population challenges are: 1. Population growth 2. Burden of endemic and infectious diseases 3. Maternal, infant and childhood mortality 4. Burden of chronic diseases, renal failure and cancer 5. Injuries and accidents 6. Smoking, other addiction s, and their complications 7. Disabilities and congenital anomalies 8 Health Systems Profile- EgyptRegional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO 8. Human resources (capabilities, skills, knowledge, allocation, salaries and incentives) 9. Infrastructure (buildings, equipment, furniture and maintenance) 10. Basic public services (housing, unplanned areas and slums, potable water, sewage disposal). The health system has significant strengths and weaknesses resulting from its continuing evolution. The performance of the sector with respect to health services, human resources, physical infrastructure, financing, organization and management, and the pharmaceutical sector will be assessed in following eight sections.Ministry of Health and Population has decided on a reform program based on the strengths of the current system, while at the same time rectifying its weaknesses. The Government of Egypt has embarked on a major restructuring of the health sector. This reform was deemed necessary bec ause the MOHP and its main partners had identified fragmentation in the delivery of health services, excessive reliance specialist care and low primary care service quality as the main constraints to achieving universal coverage.The Egyptian Health Sector Reform Program (HSRP) was officially launched in 1997. The World Bank (WB) started its contribution by designing the Master Plan for Montazah Health District in Alexandria Governorate, in May 1998. By the following year, in 1999, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was the first donor to begin field-level operations, while the European Commission (EC) joined the HSRP in November 1999. The African Development Bank (ADB) initiated its work through designing Master Plans for three health districts in June 2003.The most recent partner at HSRP is the Austrian Government, which directs its participation to improving the district hospitals as part of health district approach. The overall aim of the HSRP is twofold. Firstly to introduce a quality basic package of primary health care services, contribute to the establishment of a decentralized (district) service system and improve the availability and use of health services. Secondly to introduce institutional structural reform based on the concept of splitting purchasing/providing and the regulatory functions of the Ministry of Health and Population.Coverage would be provided by a National Social Insurance System. The ultimate goal of health sector reform initiatives is to improve the health status of the population, including reductions in infant, under-five, maternal mortality rates and population growth rates and the burden of infectious disease. The HSRP has meanwhile initiated a new primary care strategy in accredited facilities, known as Family Health Units (FHU’s). Facilities are being contracted by a purchasing agency -the Family Health Fund (FHF) – to provide services to the population.It is envisaged that the HSRP will g radually extend its scope to the secondary level by establishing â€Å"District Provider Organizations†. The FHF will consequently develop in the direction of a full purchasing agency of services from the public and private sector. The newly introduced Family Health Model (FHM) constitutes one of the cornerstones of the reform program. It brings high quality services to the patient and will integrate most of the vertical programs into the Basic Benefit Package of services.To date the FHM has been introduced in 817 health facilities, which present 18% of the total public primary health care facilities. HSRP has an ambitious five years plan, by the end of year 2010, to cover the entire public primary health care facilities with the Family Health Model. The Egyptian Health Sector Reform Program went through several stages, including the preparatory stage from 1994 to 1996. During this stage, several valuable studies were conducted and used later to develop the â€Å"Strategies for Health Sector Change† study. 9 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMROThis was an analytical report on the Egyptian health sector. Designing the health Master Plans stage for the three pilot governorates followed this. Experimenting stage of the Family Health Model took place in one of the primary health care facilities, which took about two years to implement. This was followed by piloting stage of the Model in three governorates followed by another two governorates and included activities such as: Building staff pattern, designing the contents of the Basic Benefits Package and Essential Drug List, and other components of the Family Health Model.The Program has shifted its strategy in March 2003 from health facility oriented approach to the district approach, which was called the District Provider Organization. As of 2005, the HSRP has gradually expanded its operations to ten additional governorates, pushing the total number of involved gov ernorates to 15, which presents more than 50% of the country coverage.The Health Reform Program has three main components; (1) Service component as seen in the Family Health Mode, (2) Mandate role and functions of the Ministry of Health and Population, and (3) Introduction of a sustainable universal health insurance system. It is envisaged that all three goals and objectives can be achieved in an Integrated District Health System model. All the necessary elements are available and the Sector for Technical Support and Projects (STSP) is in developing process for an integrated health system based on a district that is evaluated internally and externally and be replicable.The Integrated District Health System (IDHS) is the district that covers the following criteria; (1) fully implements the District Provider Organization, (2) has financial sustainability, (3) separates providing from financing of health services, (4) implements the content of the district health coverage plan, (5) pro vides basic benefits and secondary care packages through public, private and NGO, (6) and applies quarterly measures for the achievements of HSRP’s five objectives. 10 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO 2 S OCIO E CONOMIC G EOPOLITICAL M APPING 2. Socio-cultural Factors Table 2-1 Socio-cultural indicators Indicators 1990 1995 2000 2004 – – – – Literacy Total: 48. 8 (92) 57. 7 (98) 67. 4 (02) 69. 4 02) Female Literacy to total literacy: 35. 3 (92) 65. 9 (98) 63. 4 (01) 67. 4 02) Women % of Workforce 29. 2(93) 18. 0(96) 18. 5(01) 21. 8(02) Primary School enrollment 98. 0(92) 98. 5(98) 91. 7(01) 99. 2(02) % Female Primary school pupils 80. 4(92) 84. 5(98) 93. 2 107. 1(02) %Urban Population 44. 0(86) 43. 0(96) 42. 8 57. 6 Human Development Index: Source: NICHP Report, Ministry of Health and Population, 2005. Egypt Human Development Report, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2004. . 2 Economy Key economic trends, policies and reforms Lack of substantial progress on economic reform since the mid 1990s has limited foreign direct investment in Egypt and kept annual GDP growth in the range of 2%-3% in 200103. However, in 2004 Egypt implemented several measures to boost foreign direct investment. In September 2004, Egypt pushed through custom reforms, proposed income and corporate tax reforms, reduced energy subsidies, and privatized several enterprises. The budget deficit rose to an estimated 8% of GDP in 2004 compared to 6. 1% of GDP the previous year, in part as a result of these reforms.Monetary pressures on an overvalued Egyptian pound led the government to float the currency in January 2003, leading to a sharp drop in its value and consequent inflationary pressure. In 2004, the Central Bank implemented measures to improve currency liquidity. Egypt reached record tourism levels, despite the Taba and Nuweiba bombings in September 2004. The development of an export market for natural gas is a bright spot for futu re growth prospects, but improvement in the capital-intensive hydrocarbons sector does little to reduce Egypt's persistent unemploymentTable 2-2 Economic Indicators Indicators 1990 GNI per Capita (Atlas method) current US$ 2000 2004 NA GNI per capita (PPP) Current International Real GDP Growth (%) 1995 1. 9 (91-92) 5 (95-96) 3. 4 (00-01) 4 (03-04) 11 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO Real GDP per Capita ($) (91- 92) 769 1,285 1,036 9. 2 (91-92) Unemployment % (estimates) 1,143 9. 6 (91-92) 9. 0 (01) 10. 2 (03) Source: Egypt Human Development Report, 2003. Ministry of Foreign Trade, Egypt, Monthly Economic Digest, February 2005. Table 2-3 Major Imports and Exports Major Exports:Crude oil and petroleum products, cotton, textiles, metal products and chemicals. Major Imports Machinery and equipment, foodstuffs, chemicals, wood products and fuels. 2. 3 Geography and Climate Map of Egypt Arab Republic of Egypt is located at the northern Africa, border ing the Mediterranean Sea, between Libya and the Gaza Strip, and the Red Sea north of Sudan, and includes the Asian Sinai Peninsula. Total area is 1,001,450 sq km (land: 995,450 sq km, water: 6,000 sq km). A total of 2,665 km border countries: Gaza Strip 11 km, Israel 266 km, Libya 1,115 km, Sudan 1,273 km.Coastline is 2,450 km. The climate is desert; hot, dry summers with moderate winters. Natural resources; petroleum, natural gas, iron ore, phosphates, manganese, limestone, gypsum, talc, asbestos, lead and zinc. 2. 4 Political/ Administrative Structure The chief of state is the President, head of government is the Prime Minister. Bicameral system consists of the People's Assembly or Majlis al-Sha'b (454 seats; 444 elected by popular vote, 10 appointed by the president; members serve five-year terms) and the 12 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMROAdvisory Council or Majlis al-Shura – which functions only in a consultative role (264 seats; 1 76 elected by popular vote, 88 appointed by the president; members serve sixyear terms; mid-term elections for half the members). People's Assembly election is in three phase voting, last held 19 October, 29 October, 8 November 2000 (next to be held October-November 2005); Advisory Council – last held May-June 2004. The Shoura Council was established constitutionally in 1980. The Shoura Council is mainly a â€Å"think-tank† to advise the Government on national policies.A committee of the Shoura Council on Health, Population and Environment examines issues relevant to these areas prior to their discussion in the Shoura Council’s plenary sessions. Although it does not have a direct legislative role, laws impacting significantly on broad government policy are required to be discussed by the Shoura Council before being passed to the People’s Assembly Laws, before going to the plenary sessions of Parliament, are referred for preliminary study to the relevant c ommittees. These specific committees are currently 22 in number; an example is the Committee for Health and Environment.This committee, consisting solely of Members of Parliament, often invites experts to its meetings for the purpose of obtaining a more comprehensive view of topics under study. The committee influences health policy changes planned for the future 13 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO 3 H EALTH STATUS AND DEMOGRAPHICS 3. 1 Health Status Indicators Table 3. 1 Health Status Indicators 1990-2005 Indicators 1990 1995 2000 2004 2005 65. 3 (92) 66. 9 (98) 67. 1 (01) 70. 1 (02) – – – – – – 63 66 24. 5 22. 4 20. 5 – 3. 9 (97) 33. 8 28. 6 26. 2 174 (92) 96 (98) 84 (01) 68 (02) 3 – – – – – 26 29. 8 28. 7 NA 17. 6 Prevalence of wasting 3. 4 4. 6 Source: NICHP Report, Ministry of Health and Population,2005. 2. 5 NA 3. 9 Life Expectancy at Birth HALE Infant Mor tality Rate Probability of dying before 5th birthday/1000 Maternal Mortality ratio Percent of Normal birth weight babies Prevalence of stunting Egypt Human Development Report,2004 Table 3-2 Indicators of Health Status by Gender and by urban rural 2006 Indicators Urban Rural Male Female Life expectancy at birth – – 69. 2 73. 6 HALE – – – – Infant Mortality Rate 27. 7 15. 3 – – Probability of dying before 5th birthday/1000 3. 9 20. 6 27. 6 24. 7 Maternal Mortality Ratio – – – – Percent of Normal Birth Weight Babies – – – – – – – Prevalence of stunning/wasting Source: NICHP Report, Ministry of Health and Population,2005. WHO Web Site,August 2005 14 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO Table 3-3 Top 10 causes of Mortality Mortality Y2005 Rank Intra-cerebral hemorrhage 21,473 Essential (primary) hypertension 20,354 Fibrosi s and cirrhosis of liver 18,434 Hepatic failure, not elsewhere classified 11,353 Atherosclerosis 10,800 Arterial embolism and thrombosis 8,233 Elevated blood glucose level ,000 Acute myocardial infarction 6,645 Cerebral infarction 6,334 Others 320,011 Total 431,637 Source: NICHP Report, Ministry of Health and Population, 2005. The Burden of Disease and Injury in Egypt (Mortality and Morbidity). 2004. 3. 2 Demography Demographic patterns and trends Total population of Arab Republic of Egypt is 77,505,756 (July 2005 est. ). The age distribution is 0-14 years presents 33% (male 13,106,043/female 12,483,899), 15-64 years presents 62. 6% (male 24,531,266/female 23,972,216), 65 years and over presents 4. 4% (male 1,457,097/ female 1,955,235) (2005 est. ).Net migration rate is -0. 22 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2005 est. ). Sex ratio: at birth 1. 05 male(s)/female, under 15 years it is 1. 05 male(s)/ female, 15-64 years it is 1. 02 male(s)/female, 65 years and over it is 0. 74 male(s)/fem ale, for the total population it is 1. 02 male(s)/female (2005 est. ) The median age is 23. 68 years, 23. 31 years for males and 24. 05 years for females (2005 est. ). Eastern Hamitic stock (Egyptians and Bedouins) presents 99%, Greek, Nubian, Armenian, other European (primarily Italian and French) presents 1%. Muslim (mostly Sunni) 94%, Coptic Christian and other 6%.Arabic is the official language, English and French are widely understood by educated classes. 57. 7% of the population (age 15 and over) can read and write. Male presents 68. 3% and female presents female: 46. 9% (2003 est. ). 15 Health Systems Profile- Egypt Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO Table 3-4 Demographic Indicators Indicators 1990 1995 2000 2004 2005 – 27. 9 1997 27. 9 27. 0 (03) 25. 8 (05) – 6. 4 1997 6. 3 6. 4 (03) 6. 4 (05) 2. 4 (60. 86) 2. 08 (86-96) 2. 3 (96-02) 2. 0 (03) 19. 1 (05) 74. 7 1992 69. 7 1998 69. 9 (01) 69. 9 (02) – – 37. 8 1996 38. 8 (03) 37. 4 – 3. 90 1992

Interpersonal Film Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Interpersonal Film Paper - Essay Example Lorelai’s parents, who are seen to be quiet different than her never let her forget how much trouble she was in her early years. She therefore lives independently with Rory, however eventually she turns for their financial help in order to give Rory the best education. The show revolves around the communication and the lack thereof between the characters which leads them to a number of situations, good and bad. It depicts how Lorelai while still leaving room for her daughter to make mistakes, continues to make so many of her own. The series runs for 7 seasons all of which portray to the audience the drama of these dynamic women at their prime as well as their downfalls. It shows that how no matter what happens in their lives, the basic fact that they will always have each other, and this is what Lorelai and Rory Gilmore are all about. One of the major propellant of the ‘Gilmore girls story, as far as communication is concerned is closely associated to the aspect of American class. Firstly it is important to mention that American culture being categorized as low-context where the communication style has most of the information incorporated into a message with the need for detailed background information for social interaction (Hall, 1973). Lorelai, despite being born and raised in a wealthy atmosphere is seen to have left her home with her child at the age of seventeen. She moved to Stars Hollow and started a new life working her way up from a job as a maid at the Independence Inn to being a manager there years later. Being privileged instead of making her feel comfortable and safe made her feel repressed and controlled. The defining reason for this disparity and gap between her and her parents was due to poor communication which leads to widening the gap between them, one which already was undeniable due to very different

Stockholders' Equity (Assignment 10) Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Stockholders' Equity ( 10) - Assignment Example Common stock Authorized The most significant change was the change in comprehensive income whereby Pentair, Inc. recorded an overwhelming percentage of 576.94. The other significant change in stockholders equity involved a negative change in the amount of total stockholders’ equity which was recorded at -7.15%. 4. Check here if your firm had no preferred stock outstanding. If your company had preferred stock outstanding at any time during the most recent year, indicate which of the following features apply. Pentair, Inc did not have any preferred stock. f. For characteristics a. through e. that apply to your firms preferred stock, indicate the specifics of that characteristic to your stock. For example, if it is convertible, under what terms can it be converted? If yes, identify the number of shares issued of each type of stock, par value (if any), and total dollar amount received from each issue. Pentair, Inc. issued 98,622.564 shares and collected 15,779,610.24 million dollars. These were class A common stock. Based on the Note about P/E ratios, what does your firms price-earnings ratio tend to indicate about investors expectations regarding the companys future earnings? Pentair, Inc has a high P/E ratio and this boosts investor confidence in the firm. The ratio basically indicates that the company is expected to produce higher earnings for its shareholders. Assuming the dividend yield ratio you just computed has been fairly constant over recent years, briefly explain what this reveals about the cash return an owner receives on his/her investment each year. Do you believe this is a satisfactory return on a stockholders investment? What other source of return (besides dividends) do stockholders earn on their investment? Pentair, Inc. has a low dividend yield on its common stocks. Investors always make money from their investments in stocks in form of both

Is Obama's Health Care Reform Ethical Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Is Obama's Health Care Reform Ethical - Essay Example A recent study also revealed that in U.S., more than 44,800 excess deaths occur annually that can be associated with lack of insurance (Wilper et. al, 2009). These were the driving factors that led President Barak Obama to sign the new health care reform into law on March 23, 2010. President Obama’s health care reform was developed to achieve the following goals: To expand the population that receives health care coverage Expand the range of health care providers that consumers can choose from Improve access to health care specialists Improve the overall quality of health care services Provide more health care services Decrease the overall cost of health care services The new health care reform is estimated to reduce the number of uninsured in the country from 19% in 2010 to 8% by 2016 (International Insurance News, 2010). The provisions made in the legislation will be implemented in five phases over a period of four years. As I sat down to analyze this health care reform, I f ound that, although there are some important changes made in the reform, there are some disturbing issues as well. In the following pages, I will list the major features of the health care reform and state my position on it. Extend coverage through insurance mandate: The new legislation provides subsidies in insurance premiums and tax credits up to 35% of premiums for small businesses that employ less than 50 people to provide health care benefits. Those people who are not covered under Medicare or employer sponsored insurance will receive assistance through direct subsidies to purchase insurance through a new on-line exchange, an internet state run market place. Although at first glance, this appears to be a good change that should be implemented, there are specific aspects within the reform that is of great concern to me. The new reform supports abortion under health care, thereby directing federal funding towards abortion. Although on March 24th President Obama gave an executive order on abortion, it is insufficient to block federal funding of abortion under health care. Again, on July 29th , after the administration was exposed for having approved such funding in several states, the Obama administration released a regulation stating that elective abortions may not be covered in the high-risk pool programs. Under the new reform, $50 million have been allotted annually for school based health centers which can provide abortion services or contraceptives. Therefore, I feel that this reform is unethical since it promotes abortion and also directs federal money to do so. Guaranteed issue and individual mandate: Under the new law, health insurance will be made available to the 32 million uninsured Americans and insurance companies will be prohibited from denying coverage to people with pre-existing medical conditions. Insurance companies will also not be allowed to impose higher premiums, cost sharing, black-out periods or cancel policies for minor errors in ins urance application. I feel that this aspect of the reform will benefit a majority of the customers whose applications would otherwise be turned down by insurance companie